Q3 2026

Closing the Execution Gap

Process intelligence for planning, scheduling, and work execution — the nexus of utility operational performance.

Despite sophisticated planning tools and experienced crews, utilities struggle to translate strategic plans into efficient field execution.

Four Root Causes

Root Cause 1

Conflicting Domain Objectives

Engineering, operations, and finance optimize for different outcomes. No shared process view to align them.

Impact: Fragmented execution

Root Cause 2

Unclear Decision Rights

Ambiguity about who approves what leads to bottlenecks, rework, and delayed scope releases.

Impact: Scope release delays & revision loops

Root Cause 3

Lost Local Knowledge

Experienced crews know what the plans miss — but that knowledge isn’t captured or fed back upstream.

Impact: Rework from bad upstream data

Root Cause 4

No Phase-Based Accountability

When something goes wrong, there’s no clear way to trace the failure to the phase that caused it.

Impact: No root cause attribution

The Execution Gap

68%

Schedule Adherence

72%

First-Time Completion

35%

Wrench Time

Industry research shows utilities lose 25–35% of planned productivity to execution gaps.

Four Solution Pillars

Each pillar maps 1:1 to a root cause.

Pillar 1

Unified Objective Framework

Align engineering, operations, and finance around shared process KPIs — not departmental metrics.

Addresses: Conflicting Domain Objectives

Pillar 2

Decision Rights Clarity

Map and enforce approval workflows so scope releases happen on time, every time.

Addresses: Unclear Decision Rights

Pillar 3

Knowledge Capture Loop

Systematically capture field intelligence and feed it back into planning and design.

Addresses: Lost Local Knowledge

Pillar 4

Phase-Based Process Mining

Trace every delay and deviation to the phase that caused it — enabling true root cause analysis.

Addresses: No Phase-Based Accountability

Expected Outcomes

Schedule Adherence15–25% improvement
Revision Cycles40–60% reduction
Field Rework25–35% reduction
Wrench Time10–15% increase

Implementation Path

1. Map · Wk 1–2

Map current construction processes across all systems and stakeholders.

2. Connect · Wk 1–2

Connect data sources — ERP, scheduling, field management, GIS.

3. Mine · Wk 3–4

Apply process mining to reveal the actual execution patterns.

4. Analyze · Wk 5–6

Quantify the execution gap and identify root causes by phase.

5. Act · Wk 7–8

Deploy targeted interventions — decision rights, workflows, alerts.

6. Improve · Ongoing

Continuous monitoring and optimization as the process matures.

Design Partner Program

Looking for a Design Partner Utility

We're building Construction Operations with utilities who know the execution gap firsthand. If that's you, let's talk.